| 
    ![]()  | 
  
 
 
 
  | 
    2006 December 14 
       | 
    
Please go to the new Coffee Coaster site implemented more gracefully in Wordpress. This page @  http://brianrwright.com/CoffeeCoasterBlog/?p=5574  | 
        
Most of us know about the Pilgrims from our  history and civics classes.  Or at least  we have the Thanksgiving imagery—oven-roasted turkeys, linen tablecloths,  silverware, Indians, stern-looking white men with buckles on their hats,  stuffing, mashed potatoes, and cranberry sauce.
        
        Well, that’s about it, then.
        
        No, just kidding.   In reality, the second English permanent settlement, consisting of  Puritan Separationists, was lucky to have survived the first winter of  1620.  
        
        And the main benefit derived from the Indians was  the Indians’ forbearance from annihilating the Pilgrims. 
 
        
        Sometime in the fall of 1621, the Pilgrims did prosper sufficiently to  feast on ducks, wild turkey, fish and grains made into pottages (stews).  The first what we call Thanksgiving was  overwhelmingly an Indian affair as more than 100 Pokanokets (twice the population  of the Pilgrims) arrived at the settlement with five freshly killed deer.  
        
        Everyone stood or squatted around outdoor cooking fires eating with their  fingers and knives—forks did not arrive until 
the 1670s.  (Check out this stylish clip art presumably  designed to convey Turkey  Day history to the Britney Spears set.)
        
        The voyage of slightly more than 100 people on the  single ship required two arduous months, and winter was coming harsh and  early.  After wandering around the Cape  Cod peninsula for a while, the settlers decided on Plymouth  (named for the town they departed from in England) as their new home.
        
        Smartly, both the Pilgrims and the Indian tribe  who lived closest to the Plymouth  settlement, the Pokanoket, determined peace and cooperation would be best.  The Pilgrims were running out of living  people.  The Pokanoket and chief  Massosoit planned to forge an alliance with the English against other tribes.
 
        
        Philbrick writes another descriptive history that  reads like a novel.  He won an award for  his previous work, In  the Heart of the Sea, a story of Nantucket and the ill-fated journey of the  whaling ship Essex.  The period he covers in Mayflower is roughly  1620 through 1680, through the King Philip War that began in 1675—King Philip was an Indian leader.
        
        I appreciate learning the background and the  unvarnished truth of the most prolific of the all-American “starter kit.”  According to Philbrick, it is estimated that  35 million Americans (in 2002)are descendants of the Mayflower passengers.
        
  The  Pilgrims were Puritan Separatists, whose austere beliefs were as bizarre as  other Christian sects of the time.  They  had to stage their departure to the New World from Holland, because of persecution by the Church  of England.
  
        What is remarkable about the Pilgrims and the  Puritans who came later—the English who came to New   England were predominantly Puritan in official belief system—is  how they lightened up as a consequence mixing with the Indians and others  coming over... not to mention having to deal with issues of base survival. 
        
        Remember, four or five generations after Mr.  Philbrick’s narrative ends, nearby Boston and New England towns in general became the cradle of  liberty.  So some freethinking had to  be falling through the chapel rafters.
        
    The book also invites discussion on the  relationship between the English and the Indians; it’s a fascinating and  portentous time.  Many of us know little  about it, and it determines so much. 
###
           
      
           
           
![]()  | 
    ||||
|    |