Free Competition in Currency Bill
Ron Paul introduces HB 4248
by Jim Babka
A few weeks ago, Ron Paul introduced one of the Downsize DC Agenda bills. Throughout 2009, DC Downsizers ALONE called for Congressman Paul to re-introduce the three "Honest Money" bills using our "End the Inflation Tax" campaign. We had specifically called for the Congressman not only to resubmit these highly important levers to destroy the government's inflation tax and to "End the Fed," but we'd also encouraged every member of Congress to re-introduce these three bills in ONE NEW BILL.
We applaud Ron Paul for doing exactly that. Here is the Statement of Congressman Ron Paul Introducing the Free Competition in Currency Act HR 4248 (edited for publication, with emphasis points added).
Currency, or money, is what allows civilization to flourish. In the absence of money, barter is the name of the game; if the farmer needs shoes, he must trade his eggs and milk to the cobbler and hope that the cobbler needs eggs and milk. Money makes the transaction process far easier. Rather than having to search for someone with reciprocal wants, the farmer can exchange his milk and eggs for an agreed-upon medium of exchange with which he can then purchase shoes.
This medium of exchange should satisfy certain properties. It should be:
durable, that is to say, it does not wear out easily
portable, that is, easily carried
divisible into units usable for every-day transactions
recognizable and uniform, so that one unit of money has the same properties as every other unit
scarce, in the economic sense, so that the extant supply does not satisfy the wants of everyone demanding it
stable, so that the value of its purchasing power does not fluctuate wildly and,
reproducible, so that enough units of money can be created to satisfy the needs of exchange.
Over human history, gold and silver have been the two metals that have most often satisfied these conditions, survived the market process, and gained the trust of billions of people. Gold and silver are difficult to counterfeit, a property which ensures they will always be accepted in commerce.
It is precisely for this reason that gold and silver are anathema to governments. Gold and silver is limited in supply by nature, cannot be inflated, and thus serves as a check on the growth of government. Without the ability to inflate the currency, governments find themselves constrained in their actions, unable to carry on wars of aggression or to appease their overtaxed citizens with bread and circuses.
At this country's founding there was no government controlled national currency. Foreign coins continued to circulate within the United States, and did so for several decades.
Any power a government arrogates to itself, it is loathe to give back to the people. Just as we have gone from a constitutionally-instituted national defense consisting of a limited army and navy bolstered by militias and letters of marque and reprisal, we have moved from a system of competing currencies to a government-instituted banking cartel that monopolizes the issuance of currency.
In order to reintroduce a system of competing currencies, there are three steps that must be taken to produce a legal climate favorable to competition.
Article I Section 10 of the Constitution forbids the States from making anything but gold and silver a legal tender in payment of debts. States are not required to enact legal tender laws, but should they choose to, the only acceptable legal tender is gold and silver, the two precious metals that individuals throughout history and across cultures have used as currency. However, there is nothing in the Constitution that grants the Congress the power to enact legal tender laws. We, the Congress, have the power to coin money, regulate the value thereof, and of foreign coin, but not to declare a legal tender. Yet, there is a section of US Code that purports to establish US coins and currency, including Federal Reserve notes, as legal tender.
Historically, legal tender laws have been used to force their citizens to accept debased and devalued currency. Gresham's Law describes this phenomenon, which can be summed up in one phrase: "bad money drives out good money." A king might mint coins with half an ounce of gold and force merchants, under pain of death, to accept them as though they contained one ounce of gold. Each ounce of the king's gold could now be minted into two coins instead of one, so the king now had twice as much "money" to spend on building castles and raising armies. As these legally overvalued coins circulated, the coins containing the full ounce of gold would be pulled out of circulation and hoarded.
We saw this same phenomenon happen in the mid-1960s when the US government began to mint subsidiary coinage out of copper and nickel rather than silver. The copper and nickel coins were legally overvalued, the silver coins undervalued in relation, and silver coins vanished from circulation.
These actions also give rise to the most pernicious effects of inflation. Most of the merchants and peasants who received this devalued currency felt the full effects of inflation, the rise in prices and the lowered standard of living, before they received any of the new currency. By the time they received the new currency, prices had long since doubled, and the new currency they received would give them no benefit.
In the absence of legal tender laws, Gresham's Law no longer holds If people are free to reject debased currency, and instead demand sound money, sound money will gradually return to use in society. Merchants would have been free to reject the king's coin and accept only coins containing full metal weight.
One enterprise which attempted to popularize precious metal coins was the Liberty Dollar. Evidently the government felt threatened, as Liberty Dollars had all their precious metal coins seized by the FBI and Secret Service in 2007.
Under current federal law, coins are considered collectibles, and are... assessed at the collectibles rate of 28 percent.
Furthermore, these taxes actually tax monetary debasement. As the dollar weakens, the nominal dollar value of gold increases. The purchasing power of gold may remain relatively constant, but as the nominal dollar value increases, the federal government considers this an increase in wealth, and taxes accordingly. Thus, the more the dollar is debased, the more capital gains taxes must be paid on holdings of gold and other precious metals.
Just as pernicious are the sales and use taxes which are assessed on gold and silver at the state level in many states. Imagine having to pay sales tax at the bank every time you change a $10 bill for a roll of quarters to do laundry. Inflation is a pernicious tax on the value of money, are only on the order of 4% per year. Sales taxes in many states can take away 8% or more on every single transaction in which consumers wish to convert their Federal Reserve Notes into gold or silver.
Competing currencies will allow market participants to choose a currency that suits their needs, rather than the needs of the government. The prospect of American citizens turning away from the dollar towards alternate currencies will provide the necessary impetus to the US government to regain control of the dollar and halt its downward spiral. Restoring soundness to the dollar will remove the government's ability and incentive to inflate the currency, and keep us from launching unconstitutional wars that burden our economy to excess.
With a sound currency, everyone is better off, not just those who control the monetary system.
Now, you can join Ron Paul as he urges his colleagues to consider the redevelopment of a system of competing currencies and cosponsor the Free Competition in Currency Act. You can send your personalized messages using DownsizeDC.org's proprietary Educate the Powerful System.
Then, please be sure to Digg this Dispatch at the DownsizeDC.org blog. Help us get 200 Diggs by midnight (an account with Digg is required).