Guest Column: Federal Terror-Op[1] Double Whammy

1) Kill children and lie, 2) disarm the protectors…
by Oathkeepers and Jon Rappoport

Newtown_1It’s ironic that the freedom community has to spend so much time responding to occasional crimes of mass murder by ‘lone nuts’ when the federal government commits mass murder in the tens of thousands daily [averaged over the past several decades] and routinely as public policy. — ed.

Plus, in the more publicized US mass shootings this year—the Batman killings in Aurora, Colorado 7/20; the Sikh Temple incident in Oak Creek, Wisconsin 8/5; the recent Sandy Hook murders in Newtown, Connecticut 12/14—credible information exists that multiple shooters acted in each… information the police have suppressed. Thus, based on the Iron Law that governments always lie, the three attacks were almost certainly staged or targeted/enabled special ops to further a policy of disarming the population with institution of a full police-state dictatorship.

That’s the essential observation. My guests today show 1) how the state intentionally and criminally leaves its citizens unprotected from gun violence, 2) covers up the true causes of mass killings for which it is culpable, and 3) uses the atrocities it causes to destroy the freedom of the people to protect themselves from violence. — editor

The Federal Government is Guilty Accomplice in School Shooting in Newtown, Connecticut
by Oathkeepers

This shooting is yet another tragic example of the failed, grotesque insistence on helpless victim zones where any crazed gunman can be assured of a large number of disarmed, undefended, helpless victims, all crammed into one place, where he can kill many children before an armed defender arrives from elsewhere. It is disturbing and sick that the federal government so hates the right of the American people to bear arms, and so hates their natural right to self defense, that the government insists on making them helpless, disarmed victims for anyone who cares to kill them. And in this case, all of the teachers and staff were willfully disarmed by the Federal Government, by force of law and threat of prison, to ensure that they would be disarmed and incapable of saving the lives of the children entrusted to their care.

That makes the Federal Government complicit in the deaths of these children, and in fact an accessory to their mass murder, by forcibly disarming (with the very real threat of prison) all the teachers, all the staff, and any parent who may have been on school property. That stupid law guaranteed the shooters would meet no immediate armed resistance, which is exactly what is needed to stop such an attack.

In such a shooting (as in every criminal attack), seconds count, and the people best positioned to stop the attack are the people on the scene – the intended victims and/or their care-takers. In this case, that would mean the teachers and staff of the school who were responsible for the well-being of those children, and also the parents, who should have the ability to save the lives of their own children as they take them to and from school.

The police cannot, and do not arrive in time to stop such shooters from killing large numbers of people. They are a slow reactive force compared to an armed citizen on the scene. This should be common sense, as it is obvious that in the immediacy of a criminal attack, it is the intended victims (or their immediate care-takers) who are there, in position to put a stop to the attack, if they are capable. And being capable means being armed, trained, willing, and able to use deadly force, right then, right there. Anything less leads to what we saw here.

But no doubt the rabid anti-gun government supremacists will use this to further their agenda to disarm the American people, totally ignoring that obvious, plain-as-day truth. Anti-gun nuts trust the government with guns, but not the people, and insist that the lowly citizen must be disarmed and helpless in the face of murderous assault, and must wait on slow responding armed government employees, who will not be there when the attack starts, and most often can only really clean up the horrendous crime scene afterwards and maybe, just maybe apprehend a shooter who has chosen not to kill himself (as they usually do).

The bottom line is that these teachers and staff at the Sandy Hook Elementary School were incapable of keeping these children safe, and incapable of defending them. And one of the biggest reasons they were so incapable and unprepared to save the lives of the children entrusted to their care is because the anti-gun nuts and their fellow travelers in government insisted on disarming every adult in the vicinity, by threatening them with prison time – EXCEPT the gunmen, who don’t care about the law and thus were not disarmed. laws against carrying weapons in schools don’t stop evil men with murderous intent. Such laws only disarm the law abiding and virtuous, who are now rendered incompetent to defend the precious children in their care.

This is disgusting…. [entire Oathkeepers’ article]

Three women teachers with guns shoot Adam Lanza in a classroom—(headline that should have been)
by Jon Rappoport

Newtown_2As indicated above, best-selling author and freelance investigative journalist Jon Rappoport keeps a daily barrage of fact-filled epistles flowing to subscribers, properly entitled He writes cleanly and strongly on several issues of vital human interest on the world stage—from the dangers of prescription drugs to modern psychiatry running amok to campaings to rescue humanity from genetically modified foods. His insights into the real news on the surface and behind the killings in Newtown are uniquely incisive. The above heading is from his most recent, and here are the first few paragraphs:

When everybody is diagnosed with a mental disorder, gun permits will be a thing of the past

Take that seriously.

At a presidential debate, Obama was asked about achieving gun control. He said, “Enforce the laws we’ve already got. Make sure we are keeping the guns out of the hands of criminals…[and] those who are mentally ill.”

In case you’ve been sleeping in a cave for the past few years, the US government is doing everything it can to create more categories of crimes, and the psychiatrists are expanding the list of (fictional but enforceable) mental disorders, as they also relentlessly promote “more diagnosis and treatment.”

Some estimates state 20-25% of the US population is suffering from a mental disorder. These are absurd and cooked figures, for several reasons, but it doesn’t matter. What matters is that huge numbers of people can be arbitrarily labeled as such.

So legally owning or not owning a gun may soon hinge on a broader definition of “mentally ill,” changed to “having been diagnosed with a mental disorder,” because that is one back-door way to execute a massive gun ban.

Simply put: diagnose everybody and his brother with a mental disorder, and then assert that any such diagnosis bars a person from obtaining a gun permit.

Psychiatry, in addition to destroying lives through toxic drugs, becomes a political instrument for gun control.

In the July editions of both Psychology Today and The Psychiatric Times, the same editorial, written by Dr. Allen Frances, America’s most influential psychiatrist, spelled out a clear position:

“Guns do kill people and the number of people depends on the number of guns and the number of rounds they can fire in a given period of time.”

Of course, no mention is made of the psychiatric drugs that induce violence and murder.

Dr. Frances sums up his unequivocal position: “We really have only two choices…accept mass murder as part of the American way of life, or…get in line with rest of the civilized world and adopt sane gun control policies.”

I thought I would explore the issue of mental illness from a slightly different perspective, however: WHY ARE FANATICAL GUN GRABBERS PSYCHOTIC?

What is the nature of THEIR mental disorder?

In the wake of the Newtown massacre, the gun-control forces are on the march. Ban this, ban that, go after the Doomsday preppers and bitter clingers.

The gun grabbers don’t respond to the obvious charge that, when honest people have weapons for self-defense, they can, in fact, defend themselves and stave off crime, harm, and death.

This point doesn’t make a dent…. [entire column]

The previous emails in Jon’s series to this point are here, in the order most recent to least recent:

I highly recommend subscribing to Jon Rappoport’s Other top-of-the-line, daily sources are and the Alex Jones Infowars broadcasts and columns. Soon to be a full-featured Internet nightly news broadcast, I have high hopes for Next News Network… a) that it will be good and b) that it will become a broadcast TV alternative for the people.

SunFLOWer[Note: as a corollary, our mental and physical health also requires turning off and boycotting the multiple channels of MSM ‘information.’ Let them die, like the uber-criminal/terrorist state who enfranchises them, simply from lack of your support.]

And we shall know the truth
and the truth shall set us free

[1] {This column’s title is solely the responsibility of the editor (Brian Wright).} The federal government represents the necessary cause of the incidents in Aurora, Oak Creek, and Newtown, if not directly thru black terror operations, then indirectly by legally disabling people from reasonable self-defense by firearms.

This post has been read 2704 times!

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *