Here’s a conundrum (a puzzle with no easy solution) for you:
What’s wrong with a mass-merchandising giant bulldozing one of its dollar-days aircraft hangars and 1/2-square-mile runways into the countrysides of the world? With Walmart you “always get the lowest price. Always.”
Isn’t the free market all about satisfying the consumer as efficiently as possible? I was just at Walmart’s Sam’s Club with someone who has a membership. As with its competitors Sam’s gets some of the best brands the cheapest. Good deal, especially if you can store things in your basement for a decade or two.
Who except a pinko, liberal, homosexual, latte-drinking, communist would complain about Sam’s or its Walmart ancestry?!
A documentary movie came out in 2005, Walmart: The High Cost of Low Price. Though some of the film is slanted toward sacred cows of the modern Left, its core message is the special privileges Walmart uses to violate individual property rights and community well-being.
The film is also highly successful in capturing the emotional trauma inflicted on people whose businesses and livelihoods are destroyed when Walmart—the lesson applies to many large government-franchised corporations—force-marches your local independent business into oblivion.
Ultimately, we’re dealing with a large worldwide issue here:
How is it we would like our lives to go in our communities; how do we manage the commons; what if any privileges (Latin for private laws) do we give to corporations; are limited-liability corporations morally valid; are corporations persons; who died and made them king?
A valuable book in answering such questions is one I reviewed last week, Thom Hartmann’s Unequal Protection: The rise of corporate dominance and the theft of human rights. Others exist; I’ll even mention a pro-corporation book: Robert Hessen, a onetime Ayn Rand guy, wrote In Defense of the Corporation in 1979.
Frankly, I’m in exploratory mode toward the entity we know as the corporation, as I’m sure are many of my fellow righteous beanies and citizens.
As a thoroughgoing libertarian, I’m definitely opposed to corporate personhood, SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public participation) suits, privileged tax treatment, giving public lands to corporations, offloading corporations’ business costs to innocent civilians, giving special legal treatment or exemptions, and so on.
It seems to me that citizen empowerment and privileged corporation depowerment go hand in hand.
As for the previous question of warehouse shopping, it seems right or at least not unright given the “oil/car/construction” monopoly we’ve been stuck with. Generally, in America anyway, one has to travel by car large distances to get one’s daily needs. Might as well stock up cheap.
But give me a neighborhood hardware store (there still are some), a neighborhood office supply store (all gone now), or a neighborhood grocery store (still a few) any day. I’ll pay few extra dollars per trip for the quality-of-life experience. Neighborhood bars and restaurants, too! Neighborhood most things, anyplace with real people.
I’m so tired of the chains… the chains of the chains. The chains that shackle us to multiple hierarchies of soulless drones who plunder the general nonconnected public by handing greaser politicians at all levels wheelbarrows of booty. Time for the public to wake up and figure out the universal low-life racket that screws them royally and, then, in coordinated public action take away the privileges of the screwers.
This post has been read 765 times!