Guest Column: Where’s the People…

… whose job it is to warn us of these assaults upon the Republic and its people?
And why aren’t they covering the story of the century?
And why aren’t liberty-loving YOU up in arms?

From LostHorizons.com [current ephemeral URL here]

“Stated simply, this is about an effort by the judicial branch of the U.S. government to force Doreen Hendrickson, a U.S. citizen, to commit the crime of perjury.  Because Ms. Hendrickson refused the government order to perjure herself, she was sentenced to 18 months in federal prison.  She has served 14 months of her sentence.  She has today been returned to prison to serve the remaining 4 months.  The reason she is being sent back to prison is that she still refuses to commit the crime ordered by the government.”
— Dr. Rudy List

Shredding Lies And Revealing Powerful Truths, by Pete Hendrickson

A deeper-than-ever descent into corruption by the bad guys offers a better-than-ever opportunity for the good guys.

LAST WEEK’S NEWS-LETTER OPENED with a candid presentation to the world of the outrageous corruption being practiced at very high levels of federal officialdom against my good and beautiful wife, Doreen. Yesterday, I suffered the miserable experience of driving her to a place of imprisonment, more than 500 miles from home—for the second time in three years.

I have little joy in my heart, today; in fact, I have little heart in my chest, today. I have left it in West Virginia.

BUT THERE IS THIS: On Friday, a Motion for Reconsideration was filed in the federal district court under the mantle of which the assault on Doreen has been conducted for these past 5 years. The motion is a sharp-bladed shredding of what it unmistakably-reveals to be the deeply—almost psychopathically—corrupt January 16 denial of the Motion to Vacate Doreen’s engineered conviction which was filed last October.

In-and-of itself, I’m afraid this motion is likely to do little. It goes before one of the same judges whose crimes it condemns.

This judge has already revealed herself many times to be a willing tool in the hands of a cabal of long-time DOJ Tax Division apparatchiks who reek of contempt for the law and whose only interest is in perpetuating the “ignorance tax” scheme by any means necessary, even beating up on a truth-telling scholar’s 63-year-old wife. Therefore this motion’s real utility in the legal arena will likely come only when its substance is translated into an appeal brief (or a civil suit, or a criminal trial for the guilty parties).

Nonetheless, the motion is a thing of considerable power, and it CAN do a great deal of good in the right places. With your help.

THE MOTION IS HERE. Exhibits are found at links provided within the motion text.
PLEASE READ IT THROUGH. It is not too long, and it is not “legalese”-laden.
When you have finished, please:

  1. Revisit the “introduction” section, which begins on page 1.
  2. Review the discussion and exhibits concerning the phony proceedings involving Judge Edmunds.
  3. Add to what you review there the fact that this same phony proceeding was used as the basis for engineering my conviction for allegedly filing returns I did not believe true.

As I have pointed out elsewhere, the DOJ-authored “final ruling” in the Edmunds charade was delivered to my jury at the very end of my trial, without benefit of any witness to be examined about the origins or substance of the document. Included was its phony “finding” that the returns Doreen and I jointly filed for 2002 and 2003 were “false”. (As you’ve seen in the new motion, neither of us ever appeared in front of Edmunds, making the allegation incapable of even being tested, much less found to be true. But, of course, my jury never learned of this.)

This document-dump was done in direct disregard of an in limine ruling I had sought pre-trial against just such a ploy. And it is a violation of well-settled doctrine regarding the right to confront.

But it appears that by the end of trial the judge and prosecutors had become worried that their little railroad was heading south. Just before the dump the judge had refused a juror request to see statutory definitions involved in the case. Just after it he instructed the jury to deliberate based on prosecution-written “substitute definitions” for “wages”, “employee” and “employer”– in a case in which the charges were that I didn’t really believe I wasn’t a statutorily-defined “employee” who had received statutorily-defined “wages”.

THE REASON FOR THIS EXERCISE IN REVIEW (and for my little discussion of how things revealed in the Motion in Doreen’s case relate to what was done in my own) is simple. I want you to recognize that the evidence in the Motion to Reconsider, combined with the other information, makes clear that every pretense of “official opposition” to CtC and its revelations about the tax and the law are bogus.

I know YOU already know this, of course. But I want you to understand that you now have in your hands the means to make this clear to those who do not, as you never have before.

What has been done to me– and the related pretense of “courtroom defeats” of CtC supposedly in the proceedings in front of Judge Nancy Edmunds and Judge Gerald Rosen (the one in my criminal trial), and, to the same end, by association, what has been done to Doreen by her abuser, Judge Victoria Roberts– is the chief means by which the IT schemers turn the non-educated away.

Proving it has all been a fiction and a fraud, and reliant on fake “evidence” and judicial corruption, as you now can readily do, will have the opposite effect. It will bring even hardened skeptics into the educated, truth-aware camp.

And that will make all the difference.

USE WHAT I AM GIVING YOU today. Be creative in your presentations; be clever, and be confident, but above all, be proactive.

In short, be an agent of change.

“Cowardice asks the question: is it safe? Expediency asks the question: is it political? Vanity asks the question: is it popular? But conscience asks the question: is it right? And there comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe, nor political, nor popular – but one must take it simply because it is right.” — Martin Luther King, Jr.

***

BY THE WAY: For purposes of a parallel effort to the one outlined above (not as a substitute), info about a virtuous letter-writing campaign focused on securing relief for Doreen can be found posted here.

Doreen’s address:
Doreen Hendrickson 48564-039
FPC Alderson A-4
P.O. Box A
Alderson, WV 24910

Letters, books and cards (which must actually be written in, btw, or they are confiscated lest they be traded about amongst the prisoners as currency) are always much appreciated.

Also be aware of Doreen’s Gofundme project here. And you may always send donations to Pete at: Pete Hendrickson, 232 Oriole St., Commerce Twp, MI 48382.

This post has been read 452 times!

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *