Brian’s Column: Fifteen Fatal Flaws in the Fable of 9/11

Killer contradictions in the Official Conspiracy Theory[1] of the 9/11 Attacks

After_911_Truth_Cover_Front_ReducedAs I was working on my After 9/11 Truth book and funding project over the past two weeks it occurred to me that the first part of the book—which is a digest of significant scientific, engineering, and forensic works that show that the Official Conspiracy Theory (OCT) is an absurd ‘pigs fly out of my butt’ viciously self-serving fairy tale—can be distilled into a rather brief list of contradictions to that story. My first cut comes up with 15. Note that a) many more such refutations of the OCT have been adduced by researchers and b) [this is absolutely crucial to grasp it only requires one contradiction to demolish the government’s official story of 9/11. That’s right, if only one of the following contradictions is true, the whole Emperor’s New Suit of the OCT flies away in the wind.

Note: I have assembled my digest of contradictions mainly from the videos Experts Speak Out, by Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Behind the Smoke Curtain, by Barbara Honegger, MS, and The New Pearl Harbor, by Massimo Mazzucco. See my column at http://brianrwright.com/CoffeeCoasterBlog/?p=5193 for all my ‘Sterling Dozen’ sources for the alternative view.

So here they are:

Fifteen Major Contradictions of the 9/11 Official Story

Note: The denier community holds that the assertions below have been debunked. Not successfully. Each claim has been fact-checked and/or verified by literally tens of thousands of researchers (some claims demonstrated by non-challenged, peer-reviewed scientific papers); incontrovertible forensic data; reputable journalists; and rigorous application of the Laws of Identity, Causality, and Noncontradiction. Most claims are explicitly accepted in the government’s own statements and documentation. Anyone who does his own independent, honest research will reach the same conclusion: 9/11 OCT = Toast. What now?

World Trade Center Buildings (Evidence of Explosive Demolition—Contradicts OCT)

  1. The existence of molten metal pools that persisted for weeks.
  2. Large amounts of residue from high-tech, military-grade nanothermite explosives.
  3. Gravitational free-fall symmetrical disintegration of the towers => explosive demolition.
  4. Reports by eyewitnesses (and by audio/visual recording) of multiple, large sequential explosions.

Regarding the Alleged Hijackers

  1. From detailed review of camera footage (taken 24/7 in all public areas of all three airports), none of the 19 ‘hijackers’ was found anywhere at those airports that day.
  2. Some of the ‘hijackers’ (same image and name) are known to physically exist after 9/11.[2]
  3. All ‘hijackers’ were ‘piss poor’ pilots in even single-engine training aircraft.[2]

Aircraft Behavior

  1. Impossible sea-level speeds, far in excess of 757/767 engine or airframe capabilities.
  2. Impossible cellphone calls from anyone while in flight at the reported times on those planes.
  3. No serial-number-validated flight or cockpit recorders of the flights; the government reports that the (indestructible) recorders of planes that hit the towers were not found.[3]

Official Behavior

  1. 9/11 war games in progress and not called off until after the attacks were complete.
  2. Evidence of sabotage and intentional creation of confusion by several officials, dereliction of duty by others, causing failure of (routine and common) aircraft interception.[4]

The Pentagon

  1. Of the 85 videos in government possession, one of the only two released was clearly doctored to eliminate aircraft or projectile image.
  2. No evidence of a Boeing 757 in the debris field. As at the World Trade Center, secondary explosions occurred, suggesting impact by aircraft was a cover for the true method and purpose of attack.

Flight 93

  1. Complete absence of ‘whole-plane’ Flight 93 debris in Shanksville, PA, field; debris from Flight 93 scattered over miles; FBI says it has 96% but won’t disclose whereabouts.

Finally: Wholesale Destruction of Evidence Authorized by Public Officials[5]

Officially withheld, preplanned, and deliberate destruction of evidence; documented specific 9/11 preparation and foreknowledge by persons in US and US-allied military, intelligence, and foreign policy establishments. To me this is the icing on the smoking gun: there is a reason why the law looks very negatively on the destruction of evidence. Namely, those who intentionally destroy evidence are prima facie implicated in the crime.

###Cowabunga_Video_w_Play_Button[1] The Official Conspiracy Theory is that 19 named-and-pictured Arabs commandeered four jetliners, causing the demolition of three NYC skyscrapers, damage to the Pentagon, and a mysterious sink hole in Pennsylvania… and the attendant loss of nearly 4,000 lives.

[2] Article: “Was America Attacked by Muslims on 9/11,” by Prof. David Ray Griffin.

[3] This is so unlikely as to be impossible not to have found the four bright-colored breadbox-sized recorders when, as Mazzucco reports, all the debris from the Towers was painstakingly filtered with a fine-toothed comb, TWICE, looking for identifiable remains (generally bone fragments) and effects. Vast numbers of watches, rings, coins, and other small personal items were recovered.

[4] This information of official complicity and culpability in enabling the attacks is literally everywhere in the work of the 9/11 research community. The best assessment I’ve found that leads to indictable crimes is in Kevin Ryan’s book, Another 19: Investigating Legitimate 9/11 Suspects.

[5] The deepest and most disturbing—and journalistically bravest (because it implicates Israeli government officials, its corporate gophers, and the worldwide Zionist syndicate)—journalism on long-term planning, preparations, operations, and cleanup (esp. evidence ignoring, withholding, removal, and destruction) for the crime of 9/11 comes from Christopher Bollyn’s masterpiece: Solving 9/11: The deception that changed the world.


This post has been read 2316 times!

Print Friendly

4 thoughts on “Brian’s Column: Fifteen Fatal Flaws in the Fable of 9/11

  1. If only ındicements [sic] but unfortunately all your Hıgh Court judges are complicıt, look at Judge Hellistine behind closed doors with Larry Silverstein?

  2. Great work Brian! It’s not hard to understand that the official story of 9/11 is a work of fiction once you do some serious research into it. It’s simply incredible that the powers-that-be have been able to cover it up, (and confuse people with disinformation and/or ridicule truth seekers) for so long. As a veteran, I just cannot go along with all the lies about the events of 9/11/01. It’s time for the world to get to the truth. Thank you for your work.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *